Skip to main content

Future for .NET Developers

I'm beginning to feel like .NET development may not be a solid long-term career path. When I look at Microsoft becoming less and less relevant in the consumer space with several failed initiatives such as Silverlight, Zune, Bing, and WinPhone7, I wonder how long before they are marginalized in the business space as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Managing for Motivation Not Efficiency

Beginning in the era of the industrial revolution, managers were trained and encouraged to focus on increasing productivity though increased efficiency.  This trend has continued into modern management with techniques such as Total Quality Management that focus on identifying and eliminating waste in a system. It can't be denied that this approach can be very effective when applied to a consistent, repeatable process like a manufacturing assembly line.  However, this focus on efficiency is inappropriate and even detrimental  when applied to creative, problem solving activities like software development, and unfortunately these lessons learned from manufacturing dominate the way software development is organized and managed.  It even influences some of the practices taught under the banner of Agile. This fallacy, that software development can be organized into consistently repeatable processes, was the assumption of the waterfall methodology.  Software developm...

20 Reasons Why the Traditional Performance Review For Software Developers is Bad For Business

1. Undermines Teamwork Teamwork suffers when your incentive system primarily recognizes individual achievement. Collaboration is key to producing quality software. 2. Undermines Autonomy & Purpose Feeling like you're performing to get a carrot (raise or promotion) or avoid a stick (termination) undermines an individual's sense of autonomy and purpose which is strongly tied to intrinsically motivated behavior. It is critical to have intrinsically motivated people in creative problem-solving jobs like software development.  (See previous posts) . 3. Damages Trust Between Manager and Subordinate It reinforces the idea that the manager's role is primarily to evaluate and critique. Instead of being on the same team working toward common goals, the performance review clearly places the manager and subordinate in antagonistic roles on opposites sides of the table.  It reinforces the worst boss stereotypes. 4. Not Objective No one has found a good way to quantify a so...